Their recently updated AI-assisted hiring tool is quite misleading, and the user flow isn’t very clear. I was accidentally charged $200 because of it. Thankfully, their customer service was excellent, and I was able to get a full refund.
What caught me was the line about the assistant 'remembering past interactions and decisions'. That is where it stops retrieving candidates and starts learning a manager's revealed preferences, not what made anyone good at the job. The loop tightens with use, so the real design question is not plan-versus-execute but where the human override sits, and who owns the rejection when it repeats yesterday's choices.
Their recently updated AI-assisted hiring tool is quite misleading, and the user flow isn’t very clear. I was accidentally charged $200 because of it. Thankfully, their customer service was excellent, and I was able to get a full refund.
As if AI classic hadn’t already made hiring a nightmare the past 15 years. Can linkedin be any more comically terrible?
What caught me was the line about the assistant 'remembering past interactions and decisions'. That is where it stops retrieving candidates and starts learning a manager's revealed preferences, not what made anyone good at the job. The loop tightens with use, so the real design question is not plan-versus-execute but where the human override sits, and who owns the rejection when it repeats yesterday's choices.
Where is the diagram in Section “The Supervisor Agent”?